Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #3936

open

Comparaison/validation FSW 3.2.0.24 vs 3.3.0.7 avec matrices unitaires.

Added by bruno katra about 2 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
15/03/2022
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
revision:
r0

Description

En relation avec #3877 il est pertinent de vérifier la cohérence entre 3.2.0.24 vs (3.3.0.7 avec matrices unitaires). Les comportements attendus doivent être similaires entre les 2 (à la différence près de la correction de la moyenne des ASM qui ne doit pas trop se voir dans le cadre de signaux constants).

J'ai rejoué les runs PREL-08 ( #3877 ) mais en 3.2.0.24, les datadumps sont ici :
https://ao.lpp.polytechnique.fr/index.php/apps/files/?dir=/LFR/3.2.0.24/PREL-09&fileid=2507041


Files

VERIF_LFR_FSW_R3_3_Bruno_20220315.html (770 KB) VERIF_LFR_FSW_R3_3_Bruno_20220315.html thomas chust, 15/03/2022 06:29 PM
VERIF_LFR_FSW_R3_3_Bruno_20220317.html (822 KB) VERIF_LFR_FSW_R3_3_Bruno_20220317.html thomas chust, 17/03/2022 03:49 PM
ASM_F1_bug.png (193 KB) ASM_F1_bug.png Alexis Jeandet, 18/03/2022 04:44 PM
load_asm.ipynb (26.2 KB) load_asm.ipynb Alexis Jeandet, 18/03/2022 04:52 PM
ctc-901_2022_03_21_12_45_32_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F1.svg (287 KB) ctc-901_2022_03_21_12_45_32_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F1.svg thomas chust, 21/03/2022 05:39 PM
ctc-901_diff_ASM-SWF_F1.svg (286 KB) ctc-901_diff_ASM-SWF_F1.svg thomas chust, 21/03/2022 05:39 PM
ctc-901_diff_ASM-SWF_zoom_F1.svg (260 KB) ctc-901_diff_ASM-SWF_zoom_F1.svg thomas chust, 21/03/2022 05:39 PM
ctc-901_2022_03_21_12_45_32_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F1.svg (287 KB) ctc-901_2022_03_21_12_45_32_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F1.svg thomas chust, 21/03/2022 06:00 PM
CALIB_analysis_Bruno_2_20220322.html (6.04 MB) CALIB_analysis_Bruno_2_20220322.html thomas chust, 22/03/2022 03:40 PM
CALIB_analysis_Bruno_2_ctc-900_20220322.html (6.3 MB) CALIB_analysis_Bruno_2_ctc-900_20220322.html thomas chust, 22/03/2022 05:45 PM
ctc-900_2022_03_22_13_49_52_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F0.svg (257 KB) ctc-900_2022_03_22_13_49_52_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F0.svg thomas chust, 22/03/2022 05:46 PM
ctc-900_2022_03_22_13_49_52_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F0.svg (257 KB) ctc-900_2022_03_22_13_49_52_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F0.svg thomas chust, 22/03/2022 05:46 PM
ctc-902_2022_03_23_09_21_35_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F2.svg (264 KB) ctc-902_2022_03_23_09_21_35_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F2.svg thomas chust, 24/03/2022 06:12 AM
ctc-902_2022_03_23_09_21_35_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F2.svg (264 KB) ctc-902_2022_03_23_09_21_35_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F2.svg thomas chust, 24/03/2022 06:12 AM
CALIB_analysis_Bruno_2_ctc-902_20220323.html (5.64 MB) CALIB_analysis_Bruno_2_ctc-902_20220323.html thomas chust, 24/03/2022 06:12 AM
ctc-910_2022_03_28_10_40_40_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F0.svg (257 KB) ctc-910_2022_03_28_10_40_40_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F0.svg thomas chust, 28/03/2022 02:58 PM
ctc-910_2022_03_28_10_40_40_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F0.svg (257 KB) ctc-910_2022_03_28_10_40_40_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F0.svg thomas chust, 28/03/2022 02:58 PM
ctc-912_2022_03_28_12_20_41_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F2.svg (264 KB) ctc-912_2022_03_28_12_20_41_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F2.svg thomas chust, 28/03/2022 03:09 PM
ctc-912_2022_03_28_12_20_41_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F2.svg (264 KB) ctc-912_2022_03_28_12_20_41_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F2.svg thomas chust, 28/03/2022 03:09 PM
ctc-911_2022_03_28_13_50_34_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F1.svg (287 KB) ctc-911_2022_03_28_13_50_34_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM_F1.svg thomas chust, 28/03/2022 04:46 PM
ctc-911_2022_03_28_13_50_34_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F1.svg (287 KB) ctc-911_2022_03_28_13_50_34_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5_F1.svg thomas chust, 28/03/2022 04:46 PM
video_2022-04-01_10-05-12.mp4 (3.63 MB) video_2022-04-01_10-05-12.mp4 bruno katra, 01/04/2022 11:32 AM
4_5924609361346300113.mp4 (4.42 MB) 4_5924609361346300113.mp4 bruno katra, 01/04/2022 12:09 PM
diff_F2_swf_versus_asm_7.png (48.7 KB) diff_F2_swf_versus_asm_7.png thomas chust, 04/04/2022 05:01 PM
diff_F2_swf_versus_asm_0.png (58.2 KB) diff_F2_swf_versus_asm_0.png thomas chust, 04/04/2022 05:01 PM
diff_F2_swf_versus_asm_3.png (52.2 KB) diff_F2_swf_versus_asm_3.png thomas chust, 04/04/2022 05:02 PM
ctc-900_2022_06_28_15_37_35_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png (254 KB) ctc-900_2022_06_28_15_37_35_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png thomas chust, 29/06/2022 10:02 AM
ctc-900_2022_06_28_15_37_35_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png (510 KB) ctc-900_2022_06_28_15_37_35_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png thomas chust, 29/06/2022 10:02 AM
ctc-900_2022_06_29_14_32_25_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png (510 KB) ctc-900_2022_06_29_14_32_25_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png thomas chust, 29/06/2022 04:23 PM
ctc-900_diff_ASM-SWF_F0.svg (255 KB) ctc-900_diff_ASM-SWF_F0.svg thomas chust, 29/06/2022 04:23 PM
ctc-900_2022_06_29_14_32_25_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png (533 KB) ctc-900_2022_06_29_14_32_25_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png thomas chust, 29/06/2022 04:23 PM
ctc-951_diff_ASM-SWF.png (151 KB) ctc-951_diff_ASM-SWF.png thomas chust, 30/06/2022 03:33 PM
ctc-951_2022_06_30_11_07_00_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png (454 KB) ctc-951_2022_06_30_11_07_00_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png thomas chust, 30/06/2022 03:33 PM
ctc-951_2022_06_30_11_07_00_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png (460 KB) ctc-951_2022_06_30_11_07_00_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png thomas chust, 30/06/2022 03:33 PM
ctc-952_2022_07_04_12_41_53_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png (380 KB) ctc-952_2022_07_04_12_41_53_packet_record_NORMAL_SWF_5.png thomas chust, 04/07/2022 04:45 PM
ctc-952_2022_07_04_12_41_53_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png (380 KB) ctc-952_2022_07_04_12_41_53_packet_record_NORMAL_ASM.png thomas chust, 04/07/2022 04:45 PM
ctc-952_diff_ASM-SWF.png (380 KB) ctc-952_diff_ASM-SWF.png thomas chust, 04/07/2022 04:45 PM

Related issues

Related to Task #3877: Matrices de passage par défaut pour les ASM : à valider In ProgressAlexis Jeandet17/09/2021

Actions
Related to Task #3897: Faire un test avec les matrices de chgt de repère/calibration mises à 1 et 0 pour reproduire le comportement du FSW <=3.2.0.24In Progressbruno katra18/11/2021

Actions
Related to Bug #3941: Calcul des BP2 erroné pour F2 [3.3.0.7 avec matrices unitaires]Closedbruno katra28/03/2022

Actions
Related to Task #3946: Vérifier si #3936 apparait aussi en 3.3.0.4 (avant modifs SonarCoud 02/2022)Closedbruno katra01/04/2022

Actions
Related to Bug #3948: FSW <= 3.3.0.7 : fluctuation de l'amplitude des ASM avec signal stationnaireClosedthomas chust04/04/2022

Actions
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF