Bug #85: TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR: SY_LFR_N_ASM_P, SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 et , SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0 acceptés - LFR-FSW - Redmine

ICalendar

Assigned issues (open only)
All issues (open only)

Custom queries

bugs
Stalled issues
withCat

Actions

Copy link

Bug #85

closed

TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR: SY_LFR_N_ASM_P, SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 et , SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0 acceptés

Added by Gerald Saule over 10 years ago. Updated over 10 years ago.

Status:

Closed

Priority:

Immediate

Assignee:

bruno katra

Category:

Target version:

Start date:

12/03/2014

Due date:

% Done:

Estimated time:

revision:

r104

Description

Le LFR FSW accepte des périodes nulles. Ce n'est pas interdit par l'ICD; néanmoins, le comportement associé est indéfini.

09:51:24.915628, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s)
09:51:24.918065, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

09:51:25.116246, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 0(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s)
09:51:25.119052, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

09:51:25.320007, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0(s)
09:51:25.321911, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

Contexte:
LPPMON Version=0.2.2 - Branch=default - Changeset=835955994d5f

Carte mini-LFR: LFR-172200 dev V1.0; No série III (sans connecteurs sub-click)
Vhdl: mini-lfr_0.0.0.15
Soft: 1.0.0.2 (variante sur carte finale) = r104

Brique Brique Star-Dundee S/N 46120065.

TEST CASE associé(s) = SVS-0029.

RPW-SYS-MEB-LFR-ICD-00097 Issue2_Rev0
RPW-SYS-SSS-00013-LES + Annex_Release_Definition Issue2_rev1

Related issues

Related to Bug #167: TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR avec SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 0 fait planter le soft de vol

Closed

bruno katra

11/06/2014

Actions

Issue # Delay: days Cancel

History
Notes

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Gerald Saule over 10 years ago

Gerald Saule wrote:

Le LFR FSW accepte des périodes nulles. Ce n'est pas interdit par l'ICD; néanmoins, le comportement associé est indéfini.

09:51:24.915628, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s)
09:51:24.918065, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

09:51:25.116246, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 0(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s)
09:51:25.119052, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

09:51:25.320007, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0(s)
09:51:25.321911, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

Contexte:
LPPMON Version=0.2.2 - Branch=default - Changeset=835955994d5f

Carte mini-LFR: LFR-172200 dev V1.0; No série III (sans connecteurs sub-click)
Vhdl: mini-lfr_0.0.0.15
Soft: 1.0.0.2 (variante sur carte finale) = r104

Brique Brique Star-Dundee S/N 46120065.

TEST CASE associé(s) = SVS-0008.

RPW-SYS-MEB-LFR-ICD-00097 Issue2_Rev0
RPW-SYS-SSS-00013-LES + Annex_Release_Definition Issue2_rev1

Actions

Copy link

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

Status changed from New to Resolved
Assignee changed from paul leroy to bruno katra

fsw >= 1.0.0.6
Les paquets ASM et BP étant maintenant généré dans tous les modes, les paramètres associés sont vérifiés. Les tentatives d'affectations suivantes

SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0
SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 0
SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0

renvoient des paquets TM_LFR_TC_EXE_ERROR_INCONSISTENT

Actions

Copy link

Updated by bruno katra over 10 years ago

Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
Assignee changed from bruno katra to paul leroy
Priority changed from Low to Immediate

Retesté en 1.0.0.8 :

SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0
SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0
sont acceptés alors que cela devrait généré TM_LFR_TC_EXE_ERROR_INCONSISTENT

15:51:59.732976, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s)
15:51:59.735421, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

15:30:54.101723, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 3600(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0(s)
15:30:54.104649, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

Aussi :

SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 0 fait maintenant planter le soft de vol (Plus d'ack envoyé) : ouverture d'une issue séparée pour traiter ce bug.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
Assignee changed from paul leroy to bruno katra

fsw >= 1.0.0.9

tests ajoutés sur les paramètres
sy_lfr_n_asm_p
sy_lfr_n_bp_p0
sy_lfr_n_bp_p1
sy_lfr_b_bp_p0
sy_lfr_b_bp_p1
sy_lfr_s1_bp_p0
sy_lfr_s1_bp_p1
sy_lfr_s2_bp_p0
sy_lfr_s2_bp_p1

Les valeurs inféieures à la valeur par défaut sont interdites.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by bruno katra over 10 years ago

Assignee changed from bruno katra to paul leroy

retesté en 1.0.0.9 : le bug est bien corrigé pour SY_LFR_N_BP_P1=0 :

13:56:23.743874, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TC_PACKET = 1, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: PRIVATE_SCIENCE_OR_TELECOMMAND = 12, (PACKET_ID=0x1ccc), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=9039, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xe34f), PACKET_LENGTH=15, CCSDS_SECONDARY_HEADER_FLAG=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, ACK_EXECUTION_COMPLETION=0, ACK_EXECUTION_PROGRESS=0, ACK_EXECUTION_START=0, ACK_ACCEPTANCE=0, SERVICE_TYPE: EQ_CONFIGURATION = 181, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: LOAD_NORMAL_PARAMETERS_1 = 13, SOURCE_ID: MISSION_TIMELINE = 110, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 3600(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0(s), SPARE=0x0, SY_LFR_N_CWF_LONG_F3 = 0, SPARE=0x0, CRC = 0x99d3

13:56:23.746229, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_INCONSISTENT

MAIS est toujours présent pour SY_LFR_N_ASM_P=0 :

13:45:24.218779, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TC_PACKET = 1, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: PRIVATE_SCIENCE_OR_TELECOMMAND = 12, (PACKET_ID=0x1ccc), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=6122, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xd7ea), PACKET_LENGTH=15, CCSDS_SECONDARY_HEADER_FLAG=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, ACK_EXECUTION_COMPLETION=0, ACK_EXECUTION_PROGRESS=0, ACK_EXECUTION_START=0, ACK_ACCEPTANCE=0, SERVICE_TYPE: EQ_CONFIGURATION = 181, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: LOAD_NORMAL_PARAMETERS_1 = 13, SOURCE_ID: MISSION_TIMELINE = 110, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s), SPARE=0x0, SY_LFR_N_CWF_LONG_F3 = 0, SPARE=0x0, CRC = 0xea6e

13:45:24.222073, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_SUCCESS

Contexte:
LPPMON Version=0.2.2 - Branch=default - Changeset=835955994d5f

Carte mini-LFR: LFR-172200 dev V1.0; No série III (sans connecteurs sub-click)
Vhdl: mini-lfr_0.1.16
Soft: 1.0.0.9

Brique Brique Star-Dundee S/N 46120065.

Script = SY_LFR_N_ASM-BP_P1_acceptance.py dans SVS-0008.

RPW-SYS-MEB-LFR-ICD-00097 Issue2_Rev0
RPW-SYS-SSS-00013-LES + Annex_Release_Definition Issue2_rev1

Actions

Copy link

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

Assignee changed from paul leroy to bruno katra

fsw >= 1.0.0.10
Les trois affectations suivantes sont rejetées (TM_LFR_TC_EXE_INCONSISTENT):
SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0
SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 0
SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0

Actions

Copy link

Updated by bruno katra over 10 years ago

Status changed from Resolved to Closed

retesté en 1.0.0.10, bug corrigé :

12:14:43.246055, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TC_PACKET = 1, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: PRIVATE_SCIENCE_OR_TELECOMMAND = 12, (PACKET_ID=0x1ccc), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=12568, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xf118), PACKET_LENGTH=15, CCSDS_SECONDARY_HEADER_FLAG=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, ACK_EXECUTION_COMPLETION=0, ACK_EXECUTION_PROGRESS=0, ACK_EXECUTION_START=0, ACK_ACCEPTANCE=0, SERVICE_TYPE: EQ_CONFIGURATION = 181, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: LOAD_NORMAL_PARAMETERS_1 = 13, SOURCE_ID: MISSION_TIMELINE = 110, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 2048, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 0(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s), SPARE=0x0, SY_LFR_N_CWF_LONG_F3 = 0, SPARE=0x0, CRC = 0x949e

12:14:43.248489, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_INCONSISTENT

-----------------------------------
Contexte:
LPPMON Version=0.2.2 - Branch=default - Changeset=835955994d5f

Carte mini-LFR: LFR-172200 dev V1.0; No série III (sans connecteurs sub-click)
Vhdl: mini-lfr_0.1.16
Soft: 1.0.0.10

Brique Brique Star-Dundee S/N 46120065.

Script = SY_LFR_N_ASM-BP_P1_acceptance.py dans SVS-0008.

RPW-SYS-MEB-LFR-ICD-00097 Issue2_Rev0
RPW-SYS-SSS-00013-LES + Annex_Release_Definition Issue2_rev1

Actions

Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF

Project

General

Profile

LPP » INSTRU » Solar Orbiter LFR » LFR-FSW

ICalendar

Custom queries

Bug #85

TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR: SY_LFR_N_ASM_P, SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 et , SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 0 acceptés

Updated by Gerald Saule over 10 years ago

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

Updated by bruno katra over 10 years ago

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

Updated by bruno katra over 10 years ago

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

Updated by bruno katra over 10 years ago