Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #57

closed

TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR renvoie TM_LFR_TC_EXE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED si SY_LFR_N_SWF_L <> default value

Added by Gerald Saule almost 11 years ago. Updated over 10 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Immediate
Assignee:
Veronique bouzid
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
19/02/2014
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
revision:
r114

Description

Pour TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L affecté conformément à Bug #816 (SY_LFR_N_SWF_L: >=16, multiple de 16, <= 2048), mais différent de la valeur par défaut (2048).
L'acquittement retourne TM_LFR_TC_EXE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED (excepté en NORMAL).

16:44:52.151797, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TC_PACKET = 1, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: PRIVATE_SCIENCE_OR_TELECOMMAND = 12, (PACKET_ID=0x1ccc), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=830, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xc33e), PACKET_LENGTH=15, CCSDS_SECONDARY_HEADER_FLAG=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, ACK_EXECUTION_COMPLETION=0, ACK_EXECUTION_PROGRESS=0, ACK_EXECUTION_START=0, ACK_ACCEPTANCE=0, SERVICE_TYPE: EQ_CONFIGURATION = 181, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: LOAD_NORMAL_PARAMETERS_1 = 13, SOURCE_ID: TC_SEQUENCES = 111, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 16, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 3600(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s), SPARE=0x0, SY_LFR_N_CWF_LONG_F3 = 1, SPARE=0x0, CRC = 0x4b87

16:44:52.15462, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TM_PACKET = 0, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: ACKNOWLEDGE = 1, (PACKET_ID=0xcc1), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=228, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xc0e4), PACKET_LENGTH=17, SPARE_1=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, SPARE_2=0, SERVICE_TYPE: TELECOMMAND_VERIFICATION = 1, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: TC_EXECUTION_COMPLETION_FAILURE = 8, DESTINATION_ID: TC_SEQUENCES = 111, TIME=0x80016c046b62, PA_RPW_TC_FAILURE_CODE: FUNCT_NOT_IMPL = 42002, PA_RPW_TELECOMMAND_PKT_ID=0x1ccc, PA_RPW_PKT_SEQ_CONTROL=0xc33e, PA_RPW_TC_SERVICE=181, PA_RPW_TC_SUBTYPE=13

(Cette issue reprend Bug #835 de pc-instru)

Contexte:

LPPMON Version=0.2.2 Branch=default Changeset=835955994d5f
Carte mini-LFR: LFR-172200 dev V1.0; No série III (sans connecteurs sub-click)
Vhdl: mini-lfr_0.0.0.15
Soft: 1.0.0.1 (variante sur carte finale)
Brique Star-Dundee S/N 46120065.

TEST CASE = SVS_0001_step03

RPW-SYS-MEB-LFR-ICD-00097 Issue2_Rev0
RPW-SYS-SSS-00013-LES + Annex_Release_Definition Issue2_rev1

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

Pour l'instant la possibilité de modifier à la baisse la taille des snapshots n'est pas implémentée. Le fonctionnement nominal avec les paramètres par défaut reste l'objectif principal.

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Gerald Saule over 10 years ago

  • revision changed from r98 to r114

Reproduit dans le contexte ci dessous.

Contexte:
LPPMON: Version=0.2.2 Branch=default Changeset=835955994d5f
Carte mini-LFR: LFR-172200 dev V1.0; No série III (sans connecteurs sub-click)
Vhdl: mini-lfr_0.1.9
Brique Star-Dundee S/N <illisible>.
Soft:1.0.0.5 (variante sur carte finale)

TEST CASE = SVS_0001_step03 , SVS-0073
Req = SSS-CP-EQS-431

RPW-SYS-IDB-00067-LES_Issue2_Rev2
RPW-SYS-MEB-LFR-ICD-00097 Issue2_Rev2
RPW-SYS-SSS-00013-LES + Annex_Release_Definition Issue2_rev2

Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by bruno katra over 10 years ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to Immediate

Toujours présent en 1.0.0.9(temp) :

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by paul leroy over 10 years ago

  • Assignee changed from paul leroy to Veronique bouzid

La réduction de la taille des snapshots ne sera pas implémentée sur l'EM. On peut faire une mise à jour de l'ICD dans ce sens. On va reboucler avec Thomas pour voir si c'est une fonctions indispensable, parce que ce n'est pas simple à mettre en oeuvre. En toute rigueur, il faut limiter les valeurs autorisées du paramètre à la seule valeur 2048.

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Veronique bouzid over 10 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed

J'ai vérifié ce que Paul a impléménté pour la gestion du parametre SY_LFR_N_SWF_L en rejouant le test SVS-0073

- SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = [1024,128,4096] on obtient TM_LFR_TC_EXE_INCONSISTENT

SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 128
15:33:37.197627, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TC_PACKET = 1, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: PRIVATE_SCIENCE_OR_TELECOMMAND = 12, (PACKET_ID=0x1ccc), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=4544, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xd1c0), PACKET_LENGTH=15, CCSDS_SECONDARY_HEADER_FLAG=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, ACK_EXECUTION_COMPLETION=1, ACK_EXECUTION_PROGRESS=0, ACK_EXECUTION_START=0, ACK_ACCEPTANCE=1, SERVICE_TYPE: EQ_CONFIGURATION = 181, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: LOAD_NORMAL_PARAMETERS_1 = 13, SOURCE_ID: MISSION_TIMELINE = 110, SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 128, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 3600(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s), SPARE=0x0, SY_LFR_N_CWF_LONG_F3 = 0, SPARE=0x0, CRC = 0x9156

15:33:37.292206, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_INCONSISTENT, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TM_PACKET = 0, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: ACKNOWLEDGE = 1, (PACKET_ID=0xcc1), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=6, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xc006), PACKET_LENGTH=19, SPARE_1=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, SPARE_2=0, SERVICE_TYPE: TELECOMMAND_VERIFICATION = 1, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: TC_EXECUTION_COMPLETION_FAILURE = 8, DESTINATION_ID: MISSION_TIMELINE = 110, TIME=0x80000006c33b, PA_RPW_TC_FAILURE_CODE: WRONG_APP_DATA = 5, PA_RPW_TELECOMMAND_PKT_ID=0x1ccc, PA_RPW_PKT_SEQ_CONTROL=0xd1c0, PA_RPW_TC_SERVICE=181, PA_RPW_TC_SUBTYPE=13, PA_RPW_BYTE_POSITION=10, PA_RPW_RCV_VALUE=128

SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 4096
15:33:40.399979, TC_LFR_LOAD_NORMAL_PAR, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TC_PACKET = 1, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: PRIVATE_SCIENCE_OR_TELECOMMAND = 12, (PACKET_ID=0x1ccc), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=11581, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xed3d), PACKET_LENGTH=15, CCSDS_SECONDARY_HEADER_FLAG=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, ACK_EXECUTION_COMPLETION=1, ACK_EXECUTION_PROGRESS=0, ACK_EXECUTION_START=0, ACK_ACCEPTANCE=1, SERVICE_TYPE: EQ_CONFIGURATION = 181, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: LOAD_NORMAL_PARAMETERS_1 = 13, SOURCE_ID: MISSION_TIMELINE = 110, /!\SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 4096, SY_LFR_N_SWP_P = 300(s), SY_LFR_N_ASM_P = 3600(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P0 = 4(s), SY_LFR_N_BP_P1 = 20(s), SPARE=0x0, SY_LFR_N_CWF_LONG_F3 = 0, SPARE=0x0, CRC = 0xc2ef

15:33:40.492199, TM_LFR_TC_EXE_INCONSISTENT, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TM_PACKET = 0, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: ACKNOWLEDGE = 1, (PACKET_ID=0xcc1), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=10, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xc00a), PACKET_LENGTH=19, SPARE_1=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, SPARE_2=0, SERVICE_TYPE: TELECOMMAND_VERIFICATION = 1, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: TC_EXECUTION_COMPLETION_FAILURE = 8, DESTINATION_ID: MISSION_TIMELINE = 110, TIME=0x80000009f70b, PA_RPW_TC_FAILURE_CODE: WRONG_APP_DATA = 5, PA_RPW_TELECOMMAND_PKT_ID=0x1ccc, PA_RPW_PKT_SEQ_CONTROL=0xed3d, PA_RPW_TC_SERVICE=181, PA_RPW_TC_SUBTYPE=13, PA_RPW_BYTE_POSITION=10, PA_RPW_RCV_VALUE=0

Remarque:
La fonction Detail ne detecte pas les valeurs 128 (SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 128) et 1024 comme erronées au contraire de 4096 (/!\SY_LFR_N_SWF_L = 4096).
Il faudra donc une fois les regles de parametrages entérinés modifiées cette fonction.

Le point #174 traite du meme sujet.

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF