LPP » INSTRU » Solar Orbiter LFR » LFR-FSW

Logiciel installé dans /opt/LFR/LFR-FSW/3.0.0.16
Mise à jour des scripts d'initialisation (Famille des /opt/VALIDATION_R3/LFRControlPlugin*) en positionnant FSW_VER = "3.0.0.16"
Mise à jour du fichier /opt/VALIDATION_R3/lfrverif/common/param.py

Lancement du script /home/validation/SCRIPT/just_hk_survey.py
Analyse de la premiere TM_LFR_HK
- Version du soft 3.0.0.16
- Watchdog activé SY_LFR_WATCHDOG_ENABLED: ENABLED = 1
- detection erreur absence de timecode HK_LFR_TIMECODE_MISSING=1,
- comptabilisation des erreurs HK_LFR_LE_CNT=1, HK_LFR_ME_CNT=0, HK_LFR_HE_CNT=0,
- description de la derniere erreur détectée
HK_LFR_LAST_ER_RID: LE_LFR_TIMEC = 42129, HK_LFR_LAST_ER_CODE: MISSING = 21, HK_LFR_LAST_ER_TIME=0x800000022f33,

Voici un extrait du fichier utilisé pour valider un premier test:
16:14:10.847433, TM_LFR_HK, CCSDS_VERSION_NUMBER = 0, PACKET_TYPE: TM_PACKET = 0, DATA_FIELD_HEADER_FLAG: WITH_HEADER = 1, PROCESS_ID: RPW_PID_2 = 76, PACKET_CATEGORY: HK_ROUTINE = 4, (PACKET_ID=0xcc4), SEGMENTATION_GROUPING_FLAG: STANDALONE_PACKET = 3, SEQUENCE_CNT=8, (PACKET_SEQUENCE_CONTROL=0xc008), PACKET_LENGTH=129, SPARE_1=0, PUS_VERSION = 1, SPARE_2=0, SERVICE_TYPE: HOUSEKEEPING_AND_DIAGNOSTIC_DATA_REPORTING = 3, SERVICE_SUBTYPE: HK_PARAMETER_REPORT = 25, DESTINATION_ID: GROUND = 0, TIME=0x8000000a48da, PA_LFR_HK_REPORT_SID: LFR_HK_SID = 1, HK_LFR_MODE: STANDBY = 0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_ENABLED: ENABLED = 1, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_LINK_STATE: RUN = 5, SPARE=0x0, HK_LFR_SC_POTENTIEL_FLAG: ON = 1, HK_LFR_MAG_FIELDS_FLAG: OFF = 0, SY_LFR_WATCHDOG_ENABLED: ENABLED = 1, HK_LFR_CALIB_ENABLED: DISABLED = 0, HK_LFR_RESET_CAUSE: POWER_ON = 1, SY_LFR_SW_VERSION_N1=3, SY_LFR_SW_VERSION_N2=0, SY_LFR_SW_VERSION_N3=0, SY_LFR_SW_VERSION_N4=16, SY_LFR_FPGA_VERSION_N1=1, SY_LFR_FPGA_VERSION_N2=1, SY_LFR_FPGA_VERSION_N3=89, HK_LFR_CPU_LOAD=0.392156862745, HK_LFR_CPU_LOAD_MAX=3.13725490196, HK_LFR_CPU_LOAD_AVE=0.0, HK_LFR_Q_SD_FIFO_SIZE_MAX=1, HK_LFR_Q_SD_FIFO_SIZE=50, HK_LFR_Q_RV_FIFO_SIZE_MAX=0, HK_LFR_Q_RV_FIFO_SIZE=10, HK_LFR_Q_P0_FIFO_SIZE_MAX=0, HK_LFR_Q_P0_FIFO_SIZE=10, HK_LFR_Q_P1_FIFO_SIZE_MAX=0, HK_LFR_Q_P1_FIFO_SIZE=10, HK_LFR_Q_P2_FIFO_SIZE_MAX=0, HK_LFR_Q_P2_FIFO_SIZE=5, HK_LFR_UPDATE_INFO_TC_CNT=0, HK_LFR_UPDATE_TIME_TC_CNT=0, HK_LFR_EXE_TC_CNT=0, HK_LFR_REJ_TC_CNT=0, HK_LFR_LAST_EXE_TC_ID=0x0, HK_LFR_LAST_EXE_TC_TYPE=0, HK_LFR_LAST_EXE_TC_SUBTYPE=0, HK_LFR_LAST_EXE_TC_TIME=0x000000000000, HK_LFR_LAST_REJ_TC_ID=0x0, HK_LFR_LAST_REJ_TC_TYPE=0, HK_LFR_LAST_REJ_TC_SUBTYPE=0, HK_LFR_LAST_REJ_TC_TIME=0x000000000000, HK_LFR_LE_CNT=1, HK_LFR_ME_CNT=0, HK_LFR_HE_CNT=0, HK_LFR_LAST_ER_RID: LE_LFR_TIMEC = 42129, HK_LFR_LAST_ER_CODE: MISSING = 21, HK_LFR_LAST_ER_TIME=0x800000022f33, HK_LFR_VHDL_AA=0, HK_LFR_VHDL_SM=0, HK_LFR_VHDL_FFT=0, HK_LFR_VHDL_SR=0, HK_LFR_VHDL_CIC=0, HK_LFR_VHDL_HK=0, HK_LFR_VHDL_IIR=0, HK_LFR_VHDL_CAL=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_PKT_RCV_CNT=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_PKT_SENT_CNT=8, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_TICK_OUT_CNT=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_LAST_TIMC=0, HK_LFR_LAST_FAIL_ADDR=0x0, HK_LFR_TEMP_SCM=202.49degC, HK_LFR_TEMP_PCB=18.34degC, HK_LFR_TEMP_FPGA=20.53degC, HK_LFR_SC_V_F3=592, HK_LFR_SC_E1_F3=504, HK_LFR_SC_E2_F3=378, SPARE=0x0, SY_LFR_BW=1, SY_LFR_SP0=0, SY_LFR_SP1=0, SY_LFR_R0=0, SY_LFR_R1=0, SY_LFR_R2=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_PARITY=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_DISCONNECT=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_ESCAPE=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_CREDIT=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_WRITE_SYNC=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_RX_AHB=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_TX_AHB=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_EARLY_EOP=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_INVALID_ADDR=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_EEP=0, HK_LFR_DPU_SPW_RX_TOO_BIG=0, HK_LFR_TIMECODE_ERRONEOUS=0, HK_LFR_TIMECODE_MISSING=1, HK_LFR_TIMECODE_INVALID=0, HK_LFR_TIME_TIMECODE_IT=0, HK_LFR_TIME_NOT_SYNCHRO=0, HK_LFR_TIME_TIMECODE_CTR=0, HK_LFR_BUFFER_DPU_TC_FIFO=0, HK_LFR_BUFFER_DPU_TM_FIFO=0, HK_LFR_AHB_CORRECTABLE=0, HK_LFR_AHB_UNCORRECTABLE=0, SPARE=0x0

Je demarre donc la campagne de tests fonctionnels ainsi que les tests pour valider les SWF.

Tests fait sur la synchro:
- test 1 : SBM1 30min + SBM2 30min
- test 2 : NM 60 min
Résultats: pas mal du tout, bravo Paul ! (voir fichiers joints)

Un bémol: est-ce que si le test durait plus longtemps (disons 12-24h) on n'observerait pas un décalage global bien plus grand de qqes dizaines de ms ?
Sur les données SBM on devine en effet une tendance à la baisse des courbes oscillantes; sur les données NM ce n'est pas vraiment visible ?